No Access Submitted: 21 September 2007 Accepted: 10 December 2007 Published Online: 11 March 2008
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 1297 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2831930
more...View Contributors
  • Peter Gerstoft
  • William S. Hodgkiss
  • Martin Siderius
  • Chen-Fen Huang
  • Chris H. Harrison
Ocean acoustic noise can be processed efficiently to extract Green’s function information between two receivers. By using noise array-processing techniques, it has been demonstrated that a passive array can be used as a fathometer [Siderius, et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1315–1323 (2006)]. Here, this approach is derived in both frequency and time domains and the output corresponds to the reflection sequence. From this reflection sequence, it is possible to extract seabed layering. In the ocean waveguide, most of the energy is horizontally propagating, whereas the bottom information is contained in the vertically propagating noise. Extracting the seabed information requires a dense array, since the resolution of the bottom layer is about half the array spacing. If velocity sensors are used instead of pressure sensors, the array spacing requirement can be relaxed and simulations show that just one vertical velocity sensor is sufficient.
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-05-1-0264.
  1. 1. A. Curtis, P. Gerstoft, H. Sato, R. Snieder, and K. Wapenaar, “Seismic interferometry—Turning noise into signal,” The Leading Edge https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2349814 25, 1082–1092 (2006). Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. G. D. Bensen, M. H. Ritzwoller, M. P. Barmin, A. L. Levshin, F. Lin, M. P. Moschetti, N. M. Shapiro, and Y. Yang, “Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements,” Geophys. J. Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x 169, 1239–1260 (2007). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  3. 3. R. L. Weaver and O. I. Lobkis, “Ultrasonics without a source: Thermal fluctuation correlations at MHz frequencies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.134301 87, 134301 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  4. 4. R. Snieder, “Extracting the Green’s function from the correlation of coda waves: A derivation based on stationary phase,” Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610 69, 046610 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  5. 5. K. Wapenaar, “Retrieving the elastodynamic Green’s function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301 93, 254301 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  6. 6. P. Roux, K. G. Sabra, W. A. Kuperman, and A. Roux, “Ambient noise cross-correlation in free space: Theoretical approach,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1830673 117, 79–84 (2005). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. P. Roux and W. A. Kuperman, “Extracting coherent wave fronts from acoustic ambient noise in the ocean,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1797754 116, 1995–2003 (2004). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. K. G. Sabra, P. Roux, A. M. Thode, G. L. D’Spain, W. S. Hodgkiss, and W. A. Kuperman, “Using ocean ambient noise for array self-localization and self-synchronization,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2005.850908 30, 338–347 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  9. 9. K. G. Sabra, P. Roux, and W. A. Kuperman, “Arrival-time structure of the time-averaged ambient noise cross-correlation function in an oceanic waveguide,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1835507 117, 164–174 (2005). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. M. Siderius, C. H. Harrison, and M. B. Porter, “A passive fathometer technique for imaging seabed layering using ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2227371 120, 1315–1323 (2006). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. M. Campillo and A. Paul, “Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda,” Science 229, 547–549 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. E. Larose, A. Derode, M. Campillo, and M. Fink, “Imaging from one-bit correlations of wideband diffuse wavefields,” J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1739529 95, 8393–8399 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. N. M. Shapiro, M. Campillo, L. Stehly, and M. H. Ritzwoller, “High-resolution surface wave tomography from ambient seismic noise,” Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108339 307, 1615–1617 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  14. 14. K. G. Sabra, P. Gerstoft, P. Roux, W. A. Kuperman, and M. C. Fehler, “Extracting time-domain Green’s function estimates from ambient seismic noise,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L03310 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. P. Roux, K. G. Sabra, P. Gerstoft, W. A. Kuperman, and M. C. Fehler, “P-waves from cross correlation of seismic noise,” Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023803 32, L19303 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. P. Gerstoft, K. G. Sabra, P. Roux, W. A. Kuperman, and M. C. Fehler, “Green’s functions extraction and surface-wave tomography from microseisms in southern California,” Geophysics 71, S123–S131 (2006). Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. K. Wapenaar and J. Fokkema, “Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry,” Geophysics https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2213955 71, SI33–SI46 (2006). Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. D. Draganov, K. Wapenaar, W. Mulder, J. Singer, and A. Verdel, “Retrieval of reflections from seismic background-noise measurements,” Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028735 34, L04305 (2007). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  19. 19. W. A. Kuperman and F. Ingenito, “Spatial correlation of surface generated noise in a stratified ocean,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384439 67, 1988–1996 (1980). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  20. 20. R. Snieder, K. Wapenaar, and K. Larner, “Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries,” Geophysics https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2211507 71, SI111–SI124 (2006). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  21. 21. L. A. Brooks and P. Gerstoft, “Ocean acoustic interferometry,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2723650 121, 3377–3385 (2007). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. K. Mehta, A. Bakulin, J. Sheiman, R. Calvert, and R. Snieder, “Improving the virtual source method by wavefield separation,” Geophysics https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2733020 72, V79–86 (2007). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  23. 23. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1965). Google Scholar
  24. 24. H. L. Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing (Wiley, New York, 2002). Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975). Google Scholar
  26. 26. C. H. Harrison and M. T. Siderius, “Bottom profiling by correlating beam-steered noise sequences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., in press (2008). Google Scholar
  27. 27. C. H. Harrison and D. G. Simons, “Geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise: A simple method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1506365 112, 1377–1389 (2002). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  28. 28. M. Siderius, P. L. Nielsen, and P. Gerstoft, “Range-dependent seabed characterization by inversion of acoustic data from a towed receiver array,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1502264 112, 1523–1535 (2002). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  29. 29. M. R. Fallat, P. L. Nielsen, S. E. Dosso, and M. Siderius, “Geoacoustic characterization of a range-dependent ocean environment using towed array data,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2004.838067 30, 198–206 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. P. Hursky, “Modeling and processing for vector sensors,” Office of Naval Research, Ocean Acoustics Annual Report 2006 (also available at http://www.onr.navy.mil/obs/reports/docs/06/oahursky.pdf, last visited 20 September 2007). Google Scholar
  31. 31. C. H. Harrison, “Sub-bottom profiling using ocean ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1645854 115, 1505–1515 (2004). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  32. 32. C. H. Harrison, “Performance and limitations of spectral factorization for ambient noise sub-bottom profiling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2048967 118, 2913–2923 (2005). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  33. 33. H. Schmidt, OASES Version 3.1 User Guide and Reference Manual (MIT, Cambridge, 2004). Google Scholar
  1. © 2008 Acoustical Society of America.