No Access Submitted: 13 October 2009 Accepted: 08 January 2010 Published Online: 05 April 2010
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 2193 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3303985
more...View Contributors
  • Martin Siderius
  • Heechun Song
  • Peter Gerstoft
  • William S. Hodgkiss
  • Paul Hursky
  • Chris Harrison
Recently, a technique has been developed to image seabed layers using the ocean ambient noise field as the sound source. This so called passive fathometer technique exploits the naturally occurring acoustic sounds generated on the sea-surface, primarily from breaking waves. The method is based on the cross-correlation of noise from the ocean surface with its echo from the seabed, which recovers travel times to significant seabed reflectors. To limit averaging time and make this practical, beamforming is used with a vertical array of hydrophones to reduce interference from horizontally propagating noise. The initial development used conventional beamforming, but significant improvements have been realized using adaptive techniques. In this paper, adaptive methods for this process are described and applied to several data sets to demonstrate improvements possible as compared to conventional processing.
We would like to gratefully acknowledge support for this research by the Office of Naval Research Ocean Acoustics Program. We also would also like to acknowledge the NURC for providing the MAPEX2000bis, Boundary 2003, and ElbaEx data. We would like to thank Peter Nielsen, Mark Stevenson, Finn Jensen, Charles Holland, and Michael Porter for their collaboration on these experiments and data sets, and Keyko McDonald and Brian Granger from SPAWAR for providing the Dabob Bay data.
  1. 1. M. Siderius, C. H. Harrison, and M. B. Porter, “A passive fathometer technique for imaging seabed layering using ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1315–1323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2227371, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  2. 2. C. H. Harrison, “Sub-bottom profiling using ocean ambient noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1505–1515 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1645854, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  3. 3. C. H. Harrison, “Performance and limitations of spectral factorization for ambient noise sub-bottom profiling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2913–2923 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2048967, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  4. 4. M. J. Buckingham and S. A. S. Jones, “A new shallow-ocean technique for determining the critical angle of the seabed from the vertical directionality of the ambient noise in the water column,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 938–946 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394573, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  5. 5. C. H. Harrison and D. G. Simons, “Geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise: A simple method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1377–1389 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1506365, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. C. H. Harrison and M. Siderius, “Bottom profiling by correlating beam-steered noise sequences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1282–1296 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2835416, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. S. L. Means and M. Siderius, “Effects of sea-surface conditions on passive fathometry and bottom characterization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2234–2241 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3216915, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. P. Gerstoft, W. S. Hodgkiss, M. Siderius, C. -F. Huang, and C. H. Harrison, “Passive fathometer processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1297–1305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2831930, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  9. 9. C. H. Harrison, “Anomalous signed passive fathometer impulse response when using adaptive beam forming,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3511–3513 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3126345, Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. J. Traer, P. Gerstoft, H. Song, and W. S. Hodgkiss, “On the sign of the adaptive passive fathometer impulse response,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1657–1658 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3206696, Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. A. Frantzis, “Does acoustic testing strand whales?,” Nature (London) 392, 29 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/32068, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. J. Rickett and J. Claerbout, “Acoustic daylight imaging via spectral factorization: Helioseismology and reservoir monitoring,” The Leading Edge18, 957–960 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438420, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. R. L. Weaver and O. I. Lobkis, “Ultrasonics without a source: Thermal fluctuation correlations at MHz frequencies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 134301–134304 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.134301, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  14. 14. O. I. Lobkis and R. L. Weaver, “On the emergence of the Green’s function in the correlations of a diffuse field,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3011–3017 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1417528, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. P. Roux, W. A. Kuperman, and the NPAL Group, “Extracting coherent wave fronts from acoustic ambient noise in the ocean,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1995–2003 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1797754, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  16. 16. P. Roux, K. G. Sabra, and W. A. Kuperman, “Ambient noise cross correlation in free space: Theoretical approach,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 79–83 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1830673, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  17. 17. L. A. Brooks and P. Gerstoft, “Green’s function approximation from cross-correlations of 20–100 Hz noise during a tropical storm,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 723–734 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3056563, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. K. G. Sabra, P. Roux, and W. A. Kuperman, “Arrival-time structure of the time-averaged ambient noise cross-correlation function in an oceanic waveguide,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 164–174 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1835507, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. K. G. Sabra, P. Roux, and W. A. Kuperman, “Emergence rate of the time-domain Green’s function from the ambient noise cross-correlation function,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3524–3530 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2109059, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  20. 20. O. A. Godin, “Recovering the acoustic Green’s function from ambient noise cross correlation in an inhomogeneous moving medium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 054301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.054301, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  21. 21. M. Siderius, P. L. Nielsen, and P. Gerstoft, “Range-dependent seabed characterization by inversion of acoustic data from a towed receiver array,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1523–1535 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1502264, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Part IV: Optimum Array Processing (Wiley, New York, 2002). Google Scholar
  23. 23. W. S. Burdic, Underwater Acoustic System Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984). Google Scholar
  24. 24. H. C. Song, W. A. Kuperman, W. S. Hodgkiss, P. Gerstoft, and J. S. Kim, “Null broadening with snapshot-deficient covariance matrices in passive sonar,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 28, 250–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2003.814055, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  25. 25. H. Cox, R. M. Zeskind, and M. M. Owen, “Robust adaptive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 35, 1365–1376 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165054, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. C. W. Holland, “Coupled scattering and reflection measurements in shallow water,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 27, 454–470 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2002.1040930, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2010 Acoustical Society of America.