ABSTRACT
This paper describes a new analysis of data from the 1968–72 National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). The population consisted of 1172 (792 noise-exposed and 380 “controls”) predominately white male workers from a cross section of industries within the United States. The analysis focused on how risk estimates vary according to various model assumptions, including shape of the dose-response curve and the amount of noise exposure among low-noise exposed workers (or controls). Logistic regression models were used to describe the risk of hearing handicap in relation to age, occupational noise exposure, and duration exposed. Excess risk estimates were generated for several definitions of hearing handicap. Hearing handicap is usually denoted as an average hearing threshold level (HTL) of greater than 25 dB for both ears at selected frequencies. The frequencies included in the biaural averages were (1) the articulation-weighted average over 1–4 kHz, (2) the unweighted average over 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz, and (3) the unweighted average over 1, 2, and 3 kHz. The results show that excess risk estimates for time-weighted average sound levels below 85 dB were sensitive to statistical model form and assumptions regarding the sound level to which the “control” group was exposed. The choice of frequencies used in the hearing handicap definition affected the magnitude of excess risk estimates, which depended on age and duration of exposure. Although data were limited below 85 dB, an age-stratified analysis provided evidence of excess risks at levels ranging from 80 to 84 dB, 85–89 dB, and 90–102 dB. Due to uncertainty in quantifying risks below 85 dB, new data collection efforts should focus on better characterization of dose-response and longitudinal hearing surveys that include workers exposed to 8-hour time-weighted noise levels below 85 dB. Results are compared to excess risk estimates generated using methods given by ANSI S3.44-1996.
- 1. ANSI (1969). ANSI S3.5-1969, “American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index (American National Standards Institute, New York). Google Scholar
- 2. ANSI (1996). ANSI S3.44-1996, American National Standard Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment (American National Standards Institute, New York). Google Scholar
- 3. ASHA (1981). American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on the Definition of Hearing Handicap, “On the definition of hearing handicap,” Asha 23, 293–297. Google Scholar
- 4. Baughn, W. L. (1973). “Relation between daily noise exposure and hearing loss as based on the evaluation of 6835 industrial noise exposure cases,” AMRL-TR-73-53, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Google Scholar
- 5. Breslow, N. E., and Day, N. E. (1980a). “Classical Methods of Analysis of Grouped Data,” in Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Vol. I– The Analysis of Case-control Studies (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), IARC Publication No. 32, Chap. 4, pp. 140–148. Google Scholar
- 6. Breslow, N. E., and Day, N. E. (1980b). “Unconditional Logistic Regression for Large Strata,” in Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Vol. I–The Analysis of Case-control Studies (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), IARC Publication No. 32, pp. 192–247. Google Scholar
- 7. Burns, W., and Robinson, D. W. (1970). Hearing and Noise in Industry (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London). Google Scholar
- 8. Cohen, A. (1996). Personal communication. August 1996. Google Scholar
- 9. Department of Labor (1981a). 46 Fed. Reg. 11, “Occupational noise exposure; Hearing Conservation amendment, rule, and proposed rule, part III,” pp. 4078–4179. Google Scholar
- 10. Department of Labor (1981b). “Final regulatory analysis of the hearing conservation amendment,” Report number 723-860/752 1-3, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
- 11. Efron, B. (1982). The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA). Google Scholar
- 12. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.(1986). “Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of Statistical Accuracy.” Stat. Sci. 1(1), 54–77. Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. Federal Register (1974). “Environmental Protection Agency comments on Proposed OSHA Occupational Noise Exposure Regulation,” Vol. 39, No. 244, pp. 43802–43809. Google Scholar
- 14. Fienberg, S. E. (1987). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data (MIT, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
- 15. ISO 1999 (1971). “Assessment of occupational noise exposure for hearing conservation purposes,” First Edition, International Organization for Standardization, ISO/R 1999–1971. Google Scholar
- 16. ISO 1999 (1990). “Acoustics—Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment,” International Organization for Standardization. Google Scholar
- 17. Johnson, D. L. (1978). “Derivation of presbycusis and noise induced permanent threshold shift (NIPTS) to be used for the basis of a standard on the effects of noise on hearing,” AMRL-TR-78-128, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Google Scholar
- 18. Lempert, B. L., and Henderson, T. L. (1973). “Occupational Noise and Hearing 1968 to 1972: A NIOSH Study,” U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Laboratories and Criteria Development, Cincinnati, OH. Google Scholar
- 19. NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics) (1965). “Hearing Levels of Adults by Age and Sex, United States, 1960–72,” Vital and Health Statistics, Public Health Service Publication No. 1000-Series 11-Np. 11, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
- 20. NIOSH (1972). “NIOSH criteria for a recommended standard: occupational exposure to noise,” Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHSS(NIOSH) Publication No. HIM 73-11001. Google Scholar
- 21. Passchier-Vermeer, W. (1968). “Hearing loss due to exposure to steady-state broadband noise,” Report No. 35 and Supplement to Report No. 35, Institute for Public Health Engineering, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
- 22. Robinson, D. W. (1970). “Relations between hearing loss and noise exposure,” in Hearing and Noise in Industry, edited by W. Burns and D. W. Robinson (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London), pp. 100–151. Google Scholar
- 23. Robinson, D. W., and Sutton, G. O. (1975). “A comparative analysis of data on the relation of pure-tone audiometric thresholds to age,” NPL Acoustics Report AC84, England, April 1978. Google Scholar
- 24. Royster, L. H., and Thomas, W. G.(1979). “Age effect hearing levels for awhite non-industrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and their use in evaluating hearing conservation programs,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 40, 504–511. Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). “SAS/STAT User’s Guide,” Version 6, Fourth Edition Volume 2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, pp. 1071–1125, pp. 1135–1193. Google Scholar
- 26. Statistical Sciences, Inc. (1993). S-PLUS for Windows Users Manual, Version 3.1 (Statistical Science Inc., Seattle). Google Scholar
- 27. Ward, W. D., and Glorig, A.(1975). “Protocol of inter-industry noise study,” J. Occup. Med. 17(12), 760–770. Google Scholar
- 28. Yerg, R. A., Sataloff, J., Glorig, A., and Menduke, H.(1978). “Inter-industry noise study,” J. Occup. Med. 20(5), 351–358. Google Scholar
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.
