Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship

Eja  Pedersen; Kerstin  Persson Waye

doi:10.1121/1.1815091

ABSTRACT

Installed global wind power increased by 26% during 2003, with U.S and Europe accounting for 90% of the cumulative capacity. Little is known about wind turbines’ impact on people living in their vicinity. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of annoyance due to wind turbine noise and to study dose–response relationships. Interrelationships between noise annoyance and sound characteristics, as well as the influence of subjective variables such as attitude and noise sensitivity, were also assessed. A cross-sectional study was performed in Sweden in 2000. Responses were obtained through questionnaires

(n=351;

response rate 68.4%), and doses were calculated as A-weighted sound pressure levels for each respondent. A statistically significant dose–response relationship was found, showing higher proportion of people reporting perception and annoyance than expected from the present dose–response relationships for transportation noise. The unexpected high proportion of annoyance could be due to visual interference, influencing noise annoyance, as well as the presence of intrusive sound characteristics. The respondents’ attitude to the visual impact of wind turbines on the landscape scenery was found to influence noise annoyance.

REFERENCES
Section:

1. Ackermann, T., and Söder, L.(2000). “Wind energy technology and current status—a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 4, 315–374. Google ScholarCrossref
2. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research (Chapman & Hall, London). Google Scholar
3. American Wind Energy Association (2004). Global wind energy market report 2004, http://www.awea.org/pubs/documents/globalmarket2004.pdf (last viewed online 15 June, 2004). Google Scholar
4. Arlinger, S., and Gustafsson, H.-Å. (1988). “Hur ett ljudband med konstant ljudnivå maskerar ett brusband med periodiskt varierande ljudnivå” (“How a broadband noise with constant sound pressure level masks a broadband with periodically varying sound pressure levels”), Department of Technical Audiology, Linköping University, Sweden. Google Scholar
5. Björkman, M.(2004). “Long time measurements of noise from wind turbines,” J. Sound Vib. 277, 567–572, Google ScholarCrossref
6. Fidell, S.(2003). “The Schultz curve 25 years later: A research perspective,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 3007–3015. Google ScholarScitation
7. Fidell, S., Barber, D. S., and Schultz, T. J.(1991). “Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 221–233. Google ScholarScitation
8. Hubbard, H. H., Grosveld, F. W., and Shepherd, K. P.(1983). “Noise characteristics of large wind turbine generators,” Noise Control Eng. J. 21, 21–29. Google ScholarCrossref
9. Job, R. F. S.(1988). “Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 991–1001. Google ScholarScitation
10. Kastka, J., and Hangartner, M.(1986). “Machen hässlichen Strassen den Verkehrlärm lästiger” (“Do ugly streets make traffic noise more annoying?”), Arcus1, 23–29. Google Scholar
11. Lercher, P.(1996). “Environmental noise and health: an integrated research perspective,” Environ. Int. 22, 117–128. Google ScholarCrossref
12. Lowson, M. V. (1996). “Aerodynamic noise of wind turbines,” in Proceedings of Internoise, 30 July–2 August, Liverpool, England, pp. 479–484. Google Scholar
13. Matsumura, Y., and Rylander, R.(1991). “Noise sensitivity and road traffic annoyance in a population sample,” J. Sound Vib. 151, 415–419. Google ScholarCrossref
14. Miedema, H. M. E., and Oudshoorn, C. G. M.(2001). “Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals,” Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 409–416. Google ScholarCrossref
15. Miedema, H. M. E., and Vos, H.(1998). “Exposure–response relationships for transportation noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3432–3445. Google ScholarScitation
16. Miedema, H. M. E., and Vos, H.(1999). “Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3336–3344. Google ScholarScitation
17. Miller, M. B.(1995). “Coefficient alpha: a basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling,” Struct. Eq. Model. 2, 255–273. Google ScholarCrossref
18. Nagelkerke, N. J. D.(1991). “A note on the general definition of the coefficient of determination,” Biometrika 78, 691–692. Google ScholarCrossref
19. Öhrström, E.(2004). “Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise-annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 719–729. Google ScholarScitation
20. Pedersen, E. (2000). “Störningsupplevelser från vindkraft, förstudie” (“Experience of annoyance from wind turbines, a pilot study”), Halmstad University, Sweden. Google Scholar
21. Pedersen, T. H., and Nielsen, K. S. (1994). “Genvirkning af støj fra vindmøller” (“Annoyance by noise from wind turbines”), Report 150, DELTA Acoustic & Vibration, Lydtekniske Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark. Google Scholar
22. Persson Waye, K., and Agge, A. (2000). “Experimental quantification of annoyance to unpleasant and pleasant wind turbine sounds,” in Proceedings of Internoise, 27–30 August, Nice, France, pp. 3994–3997. Google Scholar
23. Persson Waye, K., and Öhrström, E.(2002). “Psycho-acoustic characters of relevance for annoyance of wind turbine noise,” J. Sound Vib. 250, 65–73. Google ScholarCrossref
24. Persson Waye, K., Öhrström, E., and Björkman, M. (1998). “Sounds from wind turbines–can they be made more pleasant?” in Proceedings of 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, 22–26 November, Sydney, Australia, pp. 531–534. Google Scholar
25. Persson Waye K., Agge, A., and Björkman M. (2000). “Pleasant and unpleasant characteristics in wind turbine sounds,” in Proceedings of Internoise, 27–30 August, Nice, France, pp. 2327–2330. Google Scholar
26. Rand, M., and Clarke, A.(1990). “The environmental and community impacts of wind energy in the UK,” Wind Eng. 14, 319–330. Google Scholar
27. Schultz, T. J.(1978). “Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 377–405. Google ScholarScitation
28. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2001). “Ljud från vindkraftverk” (“Noise from wind turbines”), Report 6241, Stockholm, Sweden. Google Scholar
29. Viollon, S., Lavandier, C., and Drake, C.(2002). “Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment,” Appl. Acoust. 63, 493–511. Google ScholarCrossref
30. Wagner, S., Bareiss, R., and Guidati, G. (1996). “Wind turbine noise,” EUR 16823 (Springer). Google Scholar
31. Watts, G., Chinn, L., and Godfrey, N.(1999). “The effects of vegetation on the perception of traffic noise,” Appl. Acoust. 56, 39–56. Google ScholarCrossref
32. Weinsten, N. D.(1980). “Individual differences in critical tendencies and noise annoyance,” J. Sound Vib. 68, 241–248. Google ScholarCrossref
33. Wolsink, M., Sprengers, M., Keuper, A., Pedersen, T. H., and Westra, C. A. (1993). “Annoyance from wind turbine noise on sixteen sites in three countries,” European Community Wind Energy Conference, 8–12 March, Lübeck, Travemünde, Germany, pp. 273–276. Google Scholar

Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship

REFERENCES
Section:

Article Metrics

Altmetric

Resources

General Information

642

REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageABSTRACTREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES

Article Metrics

Altmetric

REFERENCES
Section: